KIPB logo

Opening up a world of opportunity

OTHER QUESTIONS

      Q1: More on JPO fees and KIPB fees

          Can you give a 'one-stop' estimate of all patent prosecution fees to grant?

          Please contact us directly, and we can provide you with our latest schedule of fees. This includes our attorney fees and the JPO's official fees for each procedure relating to Patents, Trademarks, Designs and Utility Models, etc..


          You can also find the latest official JPO fees relating to prosecution at the JPO website here.


          We can provide more specific or tailored quotes upon request (typically within one working day - call us if more urgent). We are open to negotiation for bulk orders, long-term partnerships, specification length or new customers, etc.


          Note that most of our general fees are provided upfront and at a flat rate. We do not charge attorney hours for any of our standard procedures.

          Do we (or our clients) have to pay attorney or official fees to you in advance of services or procedures rendered?

          We generally send our invoices for attorney fees after the service in question has been completed.  Note that we will provide the cost estimate upfront.  We typically ask for payment within 2 to 6 months of issuing the invoice, but this is negotiable.


          In principle, we also pay official fees for procedures at the JPO on behalf of clients and bill clients afterwards. However, this may not be possible when the official fee is rather large.

          Can I make a payment of official fees directly to the JPO?

          Unfortunately, it is not possible to pay most types of official fees directly to the JPO if you live overseas.  This includes payments by bank transfers, credit cards, checks, etc.


          Generally, a JPO revenue stamp indicating the official fee payment (which can only be purchased in Japan) must be attached to the submitted documents. Therefore, unless you or your company have a registered residence or office etc in Japan, you will need a local agent (patent attorney, etc) to provide these services for you.


          The exception is the ability to pay annual patent maintenance fees directly from overseas, by either revenue stamps or bank transfer, starting with the 4th year (note: this must be paid by the end of the previous year.) 


          Contact us for details.


      Q2: Amendments - scope, timing and cost

          What is the scope, timing and cost for amendments?

          You can file amendments supported in the disclosure— including new claims — at any time during the period from initial filing to the issue of a first office action.  Subsequently, amendments are possible during the designated response periods specified in an office action, including at the appeal stage. Specifically:


          Notice of Rejection (non-final and final office actions) — within 3 months from notification, extendable by up to 3 months (filed with an office action response).

          Decision of Rejection — within 4 months of notification (filed with an appeal)


          (Note that claim amendment restrictions apply depending on the type of office action — see 4.4 "Final" and "Non-final" Office Actions, 6.1 Decision of Rejection and Section 7 on Appeals)


          We recommend filing planned voluntary amendments with the request for examination because examination fees depend on the number of claims numbers and cannot be reimbursed later by reducing claims. This also gives the applicant the opportunity to survey the art up until the point of the request and file appropriate amendments.


          Amendments for Divisional applications

          For divisional applications, amendments to rejected parent claims will generally need to be made before an office is issued in order to avoid the possibility of a FINAL rejection based on the same rejection as the parent. 


          Amendments after grant?

          General amendments cannot be made after grant. However, a patentee can limit the scope of granted claims by requesting a “Trial for Correction”. Correcting claims is limited to (i) further limiting claim scope; (ii) correcting errors or errors in the original translations; and/or (iii) clarifying ambiguous statements. 


          Accordingly, any corrections cannot substantially broaden or alter the scope of the claimed invention. The corrections should also be fully supported in the original disclosure. A patent holder can request a trial for correction at any time apart from during the period when a patent invalidation trial (bought by a third party against the patent) is pending at the JPO (though patent holders have opportunities to correct claims in responses during such trials).

          FEES

          There are no official fees for filing voluntary amendments before examination. However, there is an official per claim fee for every claim exceeding the number of original claims in an amendment in response to an office action.

          KIPB fees are very competitive and depend on length and content. Please contact us for a quote.


          It is also possible to request deadline extensions (totalling 3 months) for filing amendments and arguments for a small official fee and KIPB admin fee.

      Q3: More on Translations

          Please provide an overview of the translation requirements for patents in Japan.

          General Requirements

          Patent applications filed in Japan must be full mirror translations of the original filing into Japanese, including the description, claims, and drawings. All official communication with the JPO is conducted in Japanese.


          Applicants may initially file in a foreign language (commonly English).


          • PCT route: Japanese translations can be submitted within 2 months from national phase entry.
          • Paris route: An English application may be filed within 12 months from the priority date, and the Japanese translation within 14 months.

           There are no extra official fees for submitting Japanese translations after filing in either route, and KIPB Japan also charges no extra fees for submitting translations after filing.


          The legal filing date will be that of the English application, but it is the translation that will be examined. Minor corrections (e.g., transcription/translation errors) can later be made based on the original English.


          Tanslations after filing

          For amendments and responses, there is no formal translation requirement. KIPB Japan attorneys typically adapt and format client-proposed amendments to ensure the best outcome under Japanese practice.


          For office actions, we usually provide JPO machine translations first, and human translations upon request.


          Divisional applications

          KIPB Japan generally files divisionals as Foreign Language Applications based on the original English filing, and then submits the Japanese translation.


          Although this approach is slightly more expensive than filing directly in Japanese, the benefits—such as ensuring consistency with the original text—usually outweigh the cost (see 5.6 Filing as a Foreign Language Application.)


          PCT amendments at the international phase

          Article 19 amendments: An applicant may substitute his/her original claims with PCT Art. 19 amended claims. A translation of these PCT Art. 19 amended claims may be submitted either at the time of Japanese national filing or within 30 months from the priority date of the PCT application - thus, even after any original claims have been filed. 


          Article 34 amendments: The above is not possible for amendments under PCT Art. 34. For such amendments, we must first file a translation of the original claims (or substitute these for translations of claims amended under PCT Art. 19) and then separately file a translation for the PCT Art. 34 claim amendments.

          KIPB Translation Fees

          KIPB Japan provides high-quality Japanese translations by our in-house specialists at competitive rates, helping clients avoid costly corrections later. Fees are negotiable for regular and trusted clients. Please contact us for a quotation.

      Q4: Recovery of Application After Missed Deadline

          What are the current rules for recovery of an application that has missed a deadline in Japan?

          There are currently two remedies for recovering /restoring an application after failure to meet a statutory or designated deadline. That is, the inability to meet the expired deadline was due to either (i) unintentional reasons” or (ii) reasons beyond the applicant’s control”


          The applicable remedy will depend on the missed procedure involved. The two remedies require different conditions to be met to recover the application – with the former much easier to prove than the latter.


          NOTE: Recovery “due to the impact of COVID-19” is no longer available. See notes at the end of this section.

          (i) “Unintentional reasons”

          Effective from April 1, 2023, applications are generally recoverable for the procedures mentioned below if the applicant (1) submits a request for recovery along with a statement explaining that the deadline was missed due to “unintentional reasons” and (2) pays a surcharge fee, within a specified period.


          The “unintentional reasons" may be due to human and management errors. There is no specific requirement to submit supporting evidence, though this can be provided voluntarily. Applicants may subsequently be requested to submit any documents to support their reasons if the JPO finds it necessary. (This is a big change from previous onerous requirements when concrete written evidence was mandatory and human/management error was inadmissible.)


          This remedy applies to deadlines that have expired on or after April 1, 2023. (The stricter condition still applies to expired deadlines before this date.)


          Note that there are currently no figures on the recovery success rate due to “unintentional reasons” because this remedy was only introduced in April 2023. However, the success rate is expected to rise to at least 60-70% of all cases from the previous 10-20% rate.


          Applicable procedures

          The following procedures are eligible for recovery if their statutory deadlines have expired due to “unintentional” reasons.


          • Submitting translation of foreign language patent applications filed in a foreign language (P, UM)
          • Submitting translation of an international PCT application for entry into the national phase (P, UM)
          • Claiming domestic priority based on another application, etc. (P, UM)*
          • Claiming priority under the Paris Convention (P, UM, D)*
          • Request for examination (Patent)
          • Delayed payments of patent maintenance fees and surcharge (from 4th year)(P (from 4th year NOT registration fee), UM, D, TM)
          • Appointment of agent for application by an overseas resident (P, UM)
          • Application for the renewal of the duration of a trademark right (TM)
          • Application for the renewal of the duration of a right based on defensive mark registration (TM)

          Note that some requests may still be denied automatically – including if the purpose for missing the request for examination deadline is to delay the examination.


          Time limits for requesting recovery due to “unintentional reasons” (for overseas applicants)

          The general time limits for submitting the recovery request are:

          1. Within two months from the date the reason for failing to file within the statutory period ceased to exist (i.e., was discovered and corrected), and
          2. Within one year (6 months for trademarks) after the missed deadline.

          *Priority recovery

          - Within 14 months from the missed priority date for Paris route applications (i.e. 12 months priority + 2 months)

          - 1 month from the translation due date for the PCT route.


          Late PCT entry in Japan

          The JPO will accept the recovery request if the national entry is submitted (i) within two months (plus two months for translation of the PCT spec.) from the date the unintentional reason ceased to exist (i.e., was discovered and corrected) and (ii) within one year from the expiry of the national phase deadline.


          For this procedure, KIPB Japan will generally file the national phase document + recovery request (Statement) + Japanese translations together.


          Official fees for submitting the recovery request:

          Previously, no official fees were applied when requesting recovery, partly because of the limited number of requests due to the unlikelihood of success. The following surcharge fees have been introduced due to an expected increase in requests after the relaxation of the rules. 


          • Patent: JPY212,100
          • Utility Model: JPY21,800
          • Design:  JPY24,500
          • Trademark: JPY86,400

          Procedure for submitting recovery request:


          The applicant should provide:

          1. A statement explaining why they could not proceed within the statutory period,
          2. The date when the applicant became able to proceed with the missed procedure.
          3. The necessary documents/fees for carrying out the procedure (if applicable).
          4. The relevant request fees.

          (ii) “Reasons beyond the applicant’s control”.

          “Reasons beyond the applicant’s control” (aka “reasons not attributable to the applicant, etc.”) is the original standard for recovery at the JPO and is still applicable for the procedures below.


          Applicants/right holders must submit concrete supporting evidence proving beyond reasonable doubt that the failure to meet a deadline was due to “reasons beyond their control”.

           

          The evidence should show that the missed deadline occurred despite the reasonable diligence expected to avoid such failure. Thus, human/management error or system shutdown, etc will likely not be regarded as sufficient proof.


          Unfortunately, the recovery success rate due to “reasons beyond the applicant’s control” is very low. We hope the JPO reconsiders these procedures at some point soon.


          Applicable procedures

          Procedures that are eligible for recovery due to “reasons beyond the applicant’s control” include the following: 


          • Submission of document indicating applicant is seeking an exception to lack of novelty (i.e., seeking “grace period”) of invention (P, D)
          • Submission of a priority certificate under the Paris Convention (P, UM, D, TM)
          • Divisional application (P, UM)
          • Conversion of a utility model or design registration into a patent application (P) 
          • Patent applications based on utility model registration (P)
          • Request for registration of extension of the duration of patent right (P) *see below
          • Submission of documents stating the basis of the calculation for the period of extension when applying to register a Patent Term Extension (P) ** see below
          • Payment of registration fees (P(= first 3 years of annuities), UM, D, TM)
          • Request for refund of patent/registration fees (P, UM, D, TM)
          • Request for appeal against a decision of rejection (P, D, TM)
          • Request for retrial (P, UM, D, TM)
          • Request for refund of examination fees or fees paid in excess (P, UM, D, TM)
          • Correction of Description etc., of an application for utility model registration (UM)
          • Withdrawal of demand for invalidation trial of utility model registration (UM)
          • Refund of fees concerning withdrawal of application for intervention (UM)
          • Request for trial against examiner’s ruling dismissing amendment (D, TM)
          • Request for refund of individual designation fees for international application (D)
          • Submission of certificate to receive special provisions concerning the time of filing of trademark application (TM)
          • Application for trademark registration after revocation of international registration (TM)
          • Application for trademark registration after denunciation of Madrid Protocol (TM)

          Time limits for filing a request for recovery (For overseas residents)

          1. Within two months from the date the reason for failing to file within the statutory period ceased to exist (i.e., was discovered and corrected), and
          2. Within six months after the missed deadline.

          * Within (i) two months and (ii) 9 months

          ** Within (i) one month and (ii) 2 months


          What “reasons beyond applicant's control” and “concrete evidence” will the JPO accept? 

          The JPO does not specify acceptable reasons or supporting evidence required for reinstatement and will consider each case on its own merits.


          Examples of “reasons beyond applicant's control” previously listed by the JPO  include:

           

          ●Absence of the agent/patent manager due to “unexpected” hospitalization.

          ●When the applicant is a company, the absence of the person(s) handling the case due to an accident/retirement from the company, etc.

          ●Demolition of the old company building due to the construction of new premises.

          ●Mistake in deadline notification due to unavoidable/unforeseen system trouble.

          ●Force majeure events such as earthquakes or war resulting in system/building failure or forced absence of staff.

           

          Examples of valid supporting evidence include medical certificates, doctor’s notes, dated statements of work from companies contacted to correct the problem etc.


          In very clear cases, such as during the COVID pandemic or in the event of a major earthquake or war, etc., there is a good chance that reinstatement will be accepted without such detailed evidence. However, the JPO generally does not provide any clear directives or announcements relating to local situations specifically. Reinstatement therefore cannot be guaranteed even if concrete (physical) evidence is provided during such major disruptions. 


          Procedure for submitting recovery request:


          The applicant should submit/provide:

          1. A statement of the grounds for restoration.
          2. The date when the applicant became able to proceed with the missed procedure.
          3. Evidential documents which support the matters presented in the Statement of grounds.
          4. The necessary documents/fees for carrying out the procedure (if applicable).

          There are no official fees for submitting this type of recovery request.


          COVID-19

          Why is the recovery “due to the impact of COVID-19” option no longer available?

          During the COVID-19 global pandemic, the JPO temporarily relaxed the requirements for recovery such that many cases were restored based on a simple statement that the inability to meet a deadline was due to the impact of Covid -19 (e.g., lockdown, illness etc.). 


          The JPO ended this temporary COVID-19 relief measure in line with the Japanese government’s downgrading of the severity of the coronavirus infection from Class 2 to Class 5 (i.e., “common infectious diseases, e.g., influenza”) on May 8, 2023.   Accordingly, COVID-19 relief measures cannot be applied to cases where the expired statutory or designated time was/is on or after May 9, 2023.

      Q5: Abandonment & Withdrawal

          When can I abandon or withdraw my application?

          An application can be withdrawn or abandoned at any time. If this is before the application is published (laid open to the public) the withdrawn/abandoned application cannot be considered as a prior application with respect to any later application.  


          Generally, applicants choose to simply let an application automatically lapse (i.e., do not respond to office actions until the application proceeds into an abandoned state) due to the fees/bureaucracy involved.


          If examination has been requested, it is possible to claim a 50% refund of the examination fee if the application is formally withdrawn before the examination procedure has commenced (i.e., before an office action has been issued.) A power of attorney form must be submitted with a formal Withdrawal request.  The Official fee for the procedure is JPY25,000.


          Note also that abandonment of a patent right does not require the consent of licensees, except in cases where an exclusive license has been registered at the JPO - in that case,  the exclusive licensee’s consent is required.

          Is it possible to file an express withdrawal/declaration of abandonment with the Japan Patent Office?

          Yes, it is possible to expedite an official withdrawal/declaration of abandonment of a patent application. 


          A Power of Attorney should be submitted to the JPO for the purpose. The cost for filing the express declaration is JPY25,000.

      Q6: Power of Attorney

          Are specific Power of Attorney documents necessary?

          POAs are only required for procedures such as appeals and assignments (they are not necessary for filing, including entering the PCT national phase).  

           

          The JPO does not require original POAs or signatures. The only requirement is that the POA includes the name of an authorised representative officer, his/her job title and the date printed thereon.


          Therefore, if you can provide us with such name/job title of an officer at the applicant, we can use this information whenever we need to submit a POA on your behalf.

           

          Can e-signatures such as a DocuSign signature be used for POA documents? 

          As stated above, no signatures are required for POAs (including e-signatures)


          With respect to other documents requiring signatures (such as an assignment of rights)—unfortunately, the JPO does not allow e-signatures (including DocuSign). Signatures should be an original or notarized true copy of the original. 

      Q7: Rights of Joint Owners

          What rights do joint owners of a patent have to work independently of the other owners?

          With regard to the scenario of two or more joint applicants/owners of a patent:


          Consent to work the patent?

          Under Japanese patent law, each joint owner may practice (“work”) the invention without the consent of the other owner(s) unless otherwise agreed by a contract.  “Work” includes manufacture, sale, use, import, etc.  


          Consent to grant licences?

          No joint owner may grant an exclusive licence or non-exclusive licence of the invention without the consent of all other joint-owners.


          Consent to transfer to 3rd party?

          A joint owner also cannot transfer their right to a third party without consent of the other owners.  However, they can file injunctions or for damages against infringement by third parties without the other(s) consent (any damages awarded will generally be based on their share of the patent).

          Can inventors be joint owners?

          Yes, in Japan, inventors automatically hold the “right to obtain a patent” once an invention is completed, regardless of their employment relationship. This right may later be assigned to their employer or other party.


          If an inventor does not assign their rights to their employer (company), the “right to obtain a patent” becomes jointly owned by the company and any inventor who has not assigned. In such cases, any patent application derived from the invention must be jointly filed by all the co-owners. Failure to do so can be grounds for refusal at examination or invalidation after grant.


          A non-assigning inventor may also bring actions such as invalidation trials or claims relating to the right to obtain a patent, but must also prove co-inventorship by evidence, which can be onerous.


          Crucially, the JPO does not review assignments of rights during examination of a patent application and assumes the listed applicant is the rightful owner. Therefore, unless the non-assigning inventor initiates legal action mentioned above, their non-assignment generally usually does not affect examination or grant.

      Q8. Postage of documents

          Does the JPO send physical documents to overseas applicants by mail?

          The JPO generally corresponds with the Japanese attorney appointed by the overseas applicant and provides physical documents to them where necessary.  However, if an overseas rights holder has not appointed a local agent (or does not have a business office in Japan), official documents may be served by international mail. 


          Note that in the event of the suspension of international mail service for 6 months or more due to an event like the COVID-19 pandemic, etc., official documents will be served to rights holders residing overseas (those with no local agent) by publication in the JPO’s Patent Gazette or other official JPO publications. Service by publication is deemed effective 20 days after publication in the gazette.