Patent Marking in Japan: Is It Required?

Steve Denney • 9 October 2026

A number of clients ask us whether patent marking is required or advisable in Japan. The short answer is: patent marking is not mandatory in Japan, and failure to mark a patented product does not prevent enforcement of the patent. However, marking can be useful as a way of notifying competitors of patent rights and deterring potential infringement.

What is patent marking?

Patent marking refers to indicating on a patented product or its packaging that the product is protected by a patent, typically by displaying the word "Patent" together with the relevant patent number.

Patent marking provides notice to competitors and members of the public that the product is protected by patent rights. This can help deter potential infringement and assist in the recovery of damages in some jurisdictions.

It can also have a commercial benefit: communicating the product's technical innovation and value.

Is patent marking mandatory in Japan?

No, there is no general legal requirement in Japan to mark patented products. Patent owners are asked to "endeavor" or "make efforts" to mark their products, but there is no obligation to do so, and no penalty for not marking.

“A patentee, exclusive licensee, or non-exclusive licensee must endeavor to mark a product that constitutes a patented invention, a product produced by a process that constitutes a patented invention, or the packaging of the patented product, with a mark ...... indicating that the product or process constituting the invention is patented.”
(Japanese Patent Act, Article 187)

Failure to mark a patented product also does not prevent the patent owner from enforcing their patent rights in Japan.

How is this different from the US?

In the United States, patent marking can directly affect the recovery of damages for past infringement. In general terms, where a patented product is subject to the marking provisions, proper marking provides constructive notice of the patent. If the product is not marked, damages can generally be recovered only for infringement occurring after the infringer receives actual notice.

Japan has no equivalent rule. Marking is not a condition for claiming damages for past infringement, and under Article 103 an infringer's negligence is presumed in any event.

However, marking can still be useful in Japan – a clear indication may deter competitors from adopting potentially infringing technology.

What should the marking say?

Japanese law provides a prescribed form of patent marking.

Under Article 68 of the Regulations for Enforcement of the Patent Act, the indication for a product patent is "Patent" (特許) together with the patent number. For a patent covering a process for producing a product, the indication is "Method Patent" (方法特許) together with the patent number.

However, this refers to the Japanese wording. Stating "Patent" or "Patented" in English with the patent number is commonly used in practice.

What about "Patent Pending"?

Japanese patent law does not mention "pending" applications in terms of marking. You may use "Patent pending" if an application is genuinely pending, but remove it once the application is refused, withdrawn or lapses.

Avoid false patent marking

The fact that patent marking is voluntary does not mean it can be used without restriction.

Article 188 of the Patent Act prohibits false patent indication (or anything confusingly similar) on a non-patented product, or representing a non-patented product as being patented in an advertisement, including on a website.

Doing so is a criminal offence, punishable by up to three years' imprisonment or a fine of up to ¥3,000,000, and in the case of a corporation, a fine of up to ¥100 million.

Patent owners using patent markings should therefore carefully check the status of the patents indicated on their products, including whether the patent has expired, lapsed or been invalidated, or whether the product has been changed so that it no longer falls within the scope of the indicated patent.

What about virtual patent marking?

In the US, the America Invents Act (2011) allows a patent owner to mark a product with the word "patent" or "pat." plus a web address, where a free, public page links the product to its patent numbers. This reduces the need to change physical product markings when patents change or expire.

Japanese law has no equivalent provision, though some companies now print a URL or QR code that leads to a patent list, which makes it easier to keep information current.

Our advice

Patent marking in Japan is optional and our clients rarely choose to do so. The principal potential benefits are notice, deterrence and marketing value. However, if you decide to patent mark your products, you should ensure the marking is accurate, including by keeping a record of the relevant patents and their expiry dates.

If you would like advice on patent marking, Japanese patent protection, or any other aspect of Japanese IP, please contact KIPB.

Steve Denney
Director, International Clients & Business Development, KIPB (Japan)

Contact KIPB Today

We offer discounted services for many first-time clients and seamless onboarding for companies transitioning their Japanese IP matters to our firm.

Red arrows branching into separate colours directions, illustrating the concept Japanese divisionals
by Steve Denney • 6 October 2026
Practical guide to divisional patent applications in Japan for US practitioners, covering filing windows, examination, amendments, doiuble patenting and strategy.
Drawing of Japanese mascot character Pon-chan, a tanuki promoting Tatebayashi City tourism
by Steve Denney • 25 August 2026
Can local mascot fame protect a trademark in Japan? Discover how Tatebayashi’s Pon-chan lost in court and what foreign brand owners must learn about JPO filings.
Banksy's sculpture in Waterloo Place, London, illustrating the artist whose trademark and copyright
by Steve Denney • 10 June 2026
After a chance encounter with Banksy’s latest artwork during INTA in London, we take a closer look at the artist’s famous trademark battles and the EUIPO rulings that tested the limits of trademark protection.
Japan Patent Office 2026 status report showing fast and reliable IP examination system
by Steve Denney • 24 April 2026
Japan’s JPO Status Report 2026 highlights fast patent examination, strong appeal success rates, and a user-friendly system for international IP applicants.
KIPB Japan attend INTA Annual Meeting 2026 in London with meeting invitation for overseas IP asso
by Steve Denney • 31 March 2026
KIPB Japan will attend INTA Annual Meeting 2026 in London from 2–6 May. Meet Steve Denney and Masa Shibata to discuss Japanese patents, trade marks and designs.
by Steve Denney • 10 December 2025
KIPB was pleased to join APAA 2025 in Kuala Lumpur, connecting with global colleagues and partners, and getting to see such a wonderful city.
KIPB JAPAN team at APAA 2025 in Kuala Lumpur
Steve Denney and Yoshiaki Kishizawa
by Steve Denney • 17 October 2025
KIPB Japan is heading to APAA 2025 in Kuala Lumpur! Join Steve Denney and Yoshiaki Kishizawa to connect, catch up, and talk about the latest in Japanese IP.
by Steve Denney • 5 June 2025
It was a pleasure for KIPB to attend INTA 2025 in San Diego, meeting with so many friends and colleagues from around the world.
#INTA2025
by Steve Denney • 3 April 2025
Join KIPB at INTA 2025 in sunny San Diego!
Show More